The Cornell University Linking Economic Development and Child Care Research Project’s Child Care Multipliers: Stimulus for the States makes the case that the child care sector’s contribution to the economy makes it a competitive target for dollars to stimulate economic development. Through its direct employment and output and purchase of goods and services, child care contributes significantly to the regional economy. The author’s analysis found that, on average, each new dollar spent in the child care sector produces a broader statewide impact of two dollars; each new job created in the sector means 1.5 jobs statewide. In addition to its importance as a parental support and contributor to child well-being, child care is established by this paper as a smart, strategic target for economic development policy and funding.
Policies to increase early care and education and expand economic opportunity.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Friday, January 29, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contributors
Search This Blog
Labels
- Family Economic Success (147)
- Child Well-being (123)
- Poverty (97)
- Early Care and Education (89)
- Data (71)
- State Budgets (71)
- Child Welfare (62)
- Federal Budget (60)
- Results (55)
- Education (53)
- Stimulus (48)
- Foster Care (47)
- Racial Equity (47)
- Policymakers (43)
- Juvenile Detention (41)
- Job Training (30)
- Ensuring Children are Healthy and Prepared to Succeed in School (29)
- Food Stamps (28)
- Healthy Children (26)
- Home Foreclosures (15)
- Medicaid (15)
- Partnerships (11)
- Low-income (10)
- Affordable Housing (8)
- SNAP (8)
- Affordable Care Act (6)
- Guest Blogger (6)
- Improve Early Grade-Level Reading (6)
- Reintegration of Ex-Offenders (6)
- Courts (5)
- Home Visiting (5)
- Sequester (5)
- mental health (4)
- Census (3)
- EITC (3)
- Health Equity (3)
- Higher Education (3)
- Income inequality (3)
- TANF (3)
- Transitioning Youth (3)
- Video (3)
- health insurance (3)
- juvenile justice (3)
- Collaboration (2)
- Disparities in Health Care (2)
- Minimum wage (2)
- Teen Pregnancy (2)
- immigration (2)
- place-based initiatives (2)
- who pays (2)
- Arizona v. United States (1)
- Black male education (1)
- Black men going to college (1)
- Buffett Rule (1)
- Child Tax Credit (1)
- Criminal Justice (1)
- DMC (1)
- Introduction to Website (1)
- Mexican migration (1)
- Minority Health Month (1)
- NIH Minority Health Promotion Day (1)
- Navigator Program (1)
- Promise Neighborhoods (1)
- SOTU (1)
- Strengthening Families (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Success Stories (1)
- asset tests (1)
- benefits of immigrant integration (1)
- http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif (1)
- immigrant demographic (1)
- just tax (1)
- progressive tax (1)
- regressive tax (1)
- social security (1)
- solitary confinement (1)
- tax policy (1)
- tax returns (1)
- unemployment insurance (1)
- welcome (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(135)
-
▼
January
(19)
- Child Care as a Competitive Target for Stimulus of...
- New Juvenile Delinquency Data: Progress and Work t...
- Preparing Foster Youth for Employment
- Looking at the Data: School Crime and Safety
- Lessons from Nebraska: NACC’s Evaluation of the St...
- The Missing Piece in Strategies for Turning Around...
- Creating and Sustaining Gains in Early Education: ...
- Child Care and the Recession, Families caught in t...
- Six Things Policymakers Should Watch to Avoid Beco...
- Some States are Taking Advantage of Under-Used Fed...
- Aligning Education, Workforce and Economic Develop...
- New Juvenile Justice Research, Could It Reshape Pu...
- Keeping Kids in College
- 10 Important Questions About Child Poverty and Fam...
- Looking at Spending Disparities and Outcomes
- Juvenile Reentry: Recommendations for Policymakers
- Where are 1 Million Children?
- Science and Social Policy
- Celebrating Infant and Toddler Policy Achievements
-
▼
January
(19)
No comments:
Post a Comment