All states have continued to use a portion of [TANF] funds to provide cash assistance to some very low-income families; however, the number of such families has fallen dramatically, to about one-third of their 1994 peak. Less than half of families who are eligible for cash assistance receive it. Many of the TANF requirements, including the work participation rate, the time limit on federal assistance, and most data reporting, are limited to families receiving cash assistance and do not apply to families receiving other benefits or services funded from the TANF block grant.Policies for enhancing TANF, as well as more policies for expanding economic opportunity.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Friday, October 9, 2009
Evaluating TANF
A policy brief by Elizabeth Lower-Basch at the Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) outlines the weaknesses of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) block grant and its implementation. She argues
Labels:
Family Economic Success
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contributors
Search This Blog
Labels
- Family Economic Success (147)
- Child Well-being (123)
- Poverty (97)
- Early Care and Education (89)
- Data (71)
- State Budgets (71)
- Child Welfare (62)
- Federal Budget (60)
- Results (55)
- Education (53)
- Stimulus (48)
- Foster Care (47)
- Racial Equity (47)
- Policymakers (43)
- Juvenile Detention (41)
- Job Training (30)
- Ensuring Children are Healthy and Prepared to Succeed in School (29)
- Food Stamps (28)
- Healthy Children (26)
- Home Foreclosures (15)
- Medicaid (15)
- Partnerships (11)
- Low-income (10)
- Affordable Housing (8)
- SNAP (8)
- Affordable Care Act (6)
- Guest Blogger (6)
- Improve Early Grade-Level Reading (6)
- Reintegration of Ex-Offenders (6)
- Courts (5)
- Home Visiting (5)
- Sequester (5)
- mental health (4)
- Census (3)
- EITC (3)
- Health Equity (3)
- Higher Education (3)
- Income inequality (3)
- TANF (3)
- Transitioning Youth (3)
- Video (3)
- health insurance (3)
- juvenile justice (3)
- Collaboration (2)
- Disparities in Health Care (2)
- Minimum wage (2)
- Teen Pregnancy (2)
- immigration (2)
- place-based initiatives (2)
- who pays (2)
- Arizona v. United States (1)
- Black male education (1)
- Black men going to college (1)
- Buffett Rule (1)
- Child Tax Credit (1)
- Criminal Justice (1)
- DMC (1)
- Introduction to Website (1)
- Mexican migration (1)
- Minority Health Month (1)
- NIH Minority Health Promotion Day (1)
- Navigator Program (1)
- Promise Neighborhoods (1)
- SOTU (1)
- Strengthening Families (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Success Stories (1)
- asset tests (1)
- benefits of immigrant integration (1)
- http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif (1)
- immigrant demographic (1)
- just tax (1)
- progressive tax (1)
- regressive tax (1)
- social security (1)
- solitary confinement (1)
- tax policy (1)
- tax returns (1)
- unemployment insurance (1)
- welcome (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(215)
-
▼
October
(21)
- Helping State Policymakers Understand and Utilize ...
- Webcast: Who Moves, Who Stays,The Resilience of Lo...
- Two Federal Agencies and a Foundation Come Togethe...
- The High Costs of High School Drop Outs
- Announcing a Senior Policy Position
- New Report Shows Families Less Likely to Notice Me...
- Tax Credits for Working Families, Information Abou...
- New Data Comparison Tool from CLASP
- A State Policymaker's Guide to Stimulating the Eco...
- Child Maltreatment Prevention Strategies
- Collaborative Pre-K Programming
- How Municipal Leaders Can Support Foster Youth Tra...
- “Georgia Works” for the Unemployed
- State Stimulus Reports Are In, But We Need to Know...
- Evaluating TANF
- Food Insecurity in the Recession
- Do Rural Moms Have Access to Family Friendly Polic...
- Partnerships for Effective Systems of Care for Chi...
- What Every Policymaker Should Know about Early Chi...
- Child Welfare, Early Care and Education, and Schoo...
- Young Adults in Rural Communities, A Longer Road
-
▼
October
(21)
No comments:
Post a Comment