Housing insecurity can have serious
negative impacts on the health of young children. Research shows that when
a child’s home is overcrowded or their family has to move multiple times due to
financial pressures, children are at risk of poor mental health, have difficulty
coping with stress, difficulty with social relationships and suffer from poor-quality
sleep. Research on housing insecurity states that:
·
Housing
insecurity increases the
risk
for childhood injuries, elevated blood pressure, respiratory conditions, and
exposure to infectious disease
·
A
history of multiple moves is associated with an increased risk of substance
abuse, behavior problems, poor school performance and teen pregnancy for older
children and adolescents
·
Multiple
moves in childhood are associated with lower overall health in adulthood
·
In
some cases inadequate housing is a contributing factor in an increased risk of
children being removed
from their homes by child welfare services
In light of the negative impacts of housing insecurity on the
health, well-being and life outcomes of children, effective housing policy is
crucial to keeping children safe, healthy and well. This includes both policies
to help homeless families find proper housing and policies to prevent families
from losing their housing in the first place. However, budget cuts at the
federal, state and local level mean that many local housing agencies are unable
to meet rising demand for housing assistance. Federal funding cuts to the Housing Choice Voucher
Program (formerly known as Section 8) due to sequestration means
that thousands of eligible people including very low-income families, the
elderly and people with disabilities are unable to get the assistance they need
to afford the rent on a decent place to live.
Housing vouchers are a critical support for many working,
poor families who live in areas where rents are high and affordable housing is
in short supply. Under the program, families pay 30-40% of their income on rent
and the voucher covers the remainder. As funding for the program has fallen, many
housing authorities have closed waiting lists (which already number in the tens
of thousands in many states) and have stopped issuing new vouchers. Some have
laid-off staff to avoid cutting off assistance to families who currently have
housing vouchers and might become homeless without them. The US Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) estimated earlier this year that 125,000
households will lose their housing assistance due to sequestration.
People who have been on the waiting list for years and finally
reached the top are being told that they
won’t be getting help after all; for instance, the New York City
Housing Authority is no longer accepting new applications or processing new
vouchers, and says that “[f]or Section 8 voucher holders who have identified an
apartment and not yet scheduled an appointment to have the housing unit
inspected and for those voucher holders who are still searching for an
apartment, the vouchers will be terminated immediately.” The Housing Authority of New Orleans had to recall housing
vouchers recently issued to 700 families who had spent years on
the waiting list and who now will have to find some other way to avoid
homelessness. In Hartford, Connecticut 20 families
have had their vouchers rescinded, as have 42 families
in Fairfax County, Virginia. In El Paso, Texas, 100 families currently
receiving assistance were told in March that their vouchers
were being taken away and they would have to either leave their homes and move
into public housing or figure out another way to keep a roof over their heads. In
Washington DC, the United States Senate is currently considering the Transportation,
Housing and Urban Development (THUD) Appropriations bill,
which would provide funding for housing choice vouchers and other housing and
homelessness measures; however, at the moment local housing authorities do not
know if next year they will face further cuts or be able to issue vouchers
again.
Receiving a Housing Choice Voucher for a family whose housing
is insecure is an invaluable support.
However, even if a family is one of the lucky few who receive a voucher,
in most states landlords can legally refuse to rent to potential tenants simply
because they are receiving rental assistance. Due to the widespread
discrimination against tenants receiving housing vouchers, in recent years some
state and local policymakers have acted to reduce the obstacles preventing
low-income families from finding a place to live. Earlier this month, Oregon
passed a new law
prohibiting discrimination against tenants who pay part of
their rent with a housing voucher. Chicago has a long-standing
city ordinance prohibiting such discrimination, and in May an amendment to
Cook County’s Human Rights Ordinance extended these rights
countywide. States such as Minnesota, Vermont and Massachusetts have similar
tenant protections, as do some other municipalities including New York City.
Legal protections and housing assistance programs help to
reduce barriers to housing security, but ensuring that affordable housing is
available in communities is critical to the success of such measures. A number
of states have created innovative policy approaches in recent years in an
attempt to increase the availability of affordable housing so that families are
not priced out of the market in their area. The Illinois Affordable Housing
Planning and Appeal Act requires that at least 10% of
housing in each community have affordable rents or mortgages. Connecticut,
Massachusetts and Rhode Island have similar statutes. Such policies help to
encourage the expansion of affordable housing so that families are not forced
to repeatedly move due to rising rents or remain in areas of concentrated
poverty because no other affordable housing is available.
State policymakers should consider new approaches to
increasing the availability of affordable housing – to ensure that working
families aren’t “priced out” of the market. They can also increase the legal
protections that prevent landlords from discriminating against families who use
housing assistance to make ends meet. Approaches to ensuring safe, stable and
affordable housing options for families not only provides a critical concrete
support now – but leads to better health, education and other well-being
outcomes for children in the future.
For policy strategies that promote
affordable housing, please visit
PolicyforResults.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment