achieved remarkable results with many public and private benefit programs, dramatically increasing program participation while lowering administrative costs and reducing erroneous eligibility determinations. The recently passed Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) should make such steps much easier for states to take in covering eligible but uninsured children. Following CHIPRA's enactment, states have both new tools and new incentives to use automated strategies in fulfilling four key functions: identifying uninsured children; determining their eligibility for health coverage; enrolling eligible children into coverage; and retaining eligible children.For policies to increase access to Medicaid and SCHIP.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
How States Can Use Automation to Increase Health Coverage for Children
The Urban Institute has a very useful report out on how states can increase enrollment of children in health insurance programs. The report details automated strategies that have
Labels:
Child Well-being,
Medicaid
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contributors
Search This Blog
Labels
- Family Economic Success (147)
- Child Well-being (123)
- Poverty (97)
- Early Care and Education (89)
- Data (71)
- State Budgets (71)
- Child Welfare (62)
- Federal Budget (60)
- Results (55)
- Education (53)
- Stimulus (48)
- Foster Care (47)
- Racial Equity (47)
- Policymakers (43)
- Juvenile Detention (41)
- Job Training (30)
- Ensuring Children are Healthy and Prepared to Succeed in School (29)
- Food Stamps (28)
- Healthy Children (26)
- Home Foreclosures (15)
- Medicaid (15)
- Partnerships (11)
- Low-income (10)
- Affordable Housing (8)
- SNAP (8)
- Affordable Care Act (6)
- Guest Blogger (6)
- Improve Early Grade-Level Reading (6)
- Reintegration of Ex-Offenders (6)
- Courts (5)
- Home Visiting (5)
- Sequester (5)
- mental health (4)
- Census (3)
- EITC (3)
- Health Equity (3)
- Higher Education (3)
- Income inequality (3)
- TANF (3)
- Transitioning Youth (3)
- Video (3)
- health insurance (3)
- juvenile justice (3)
- Collaboration (2)
- Disparities in Health Care (2)
- Minimum wage (2)
- Teen Pregnancy (2)
- immigration (2)
- place-based initiatives (2)
- who pays (2)
- Arizona v. United States (1)
- Black male education (1)
- Black men going to college (1)
- Buffett Rule (1)
- Child Tax Credit (1)
- Criminal Justice (1)
- DMC (1)
- Introduction to Website (1)
- Mexican migration (1)
- Minority Health Month (1)
- NIH Minority Health Promotion Day (1)
- Navigator Program (1)
- Promise Neighborhoods (1)
- SOTU (1)
- Strengthening Families (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Success Stories (1)
- asset tests (1)
- benefits of immigrant integration (1)
- http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif (1)
- immigrant demographic (1)
- just tax (1)
- progressive tax (1)
- regressive tax (1)
- social security (1)
- solitary confinement (1)
- tax policy (1)
- tax returns (1)
- unemployment insurance (1)
- welcome (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(215)
-
▼
June
(19)
- A New Paper on Defining "What Works"
- How Policymakers Can Work with Foundations to Redu...
- Race and the Recession
- The Effects of Foreclosures on Families, and Solut...
- New Resource for State Policymakers on Helping Gra...
- North Carolina Takes JobsNOW Online
- Governor Patrick Engages Cititzens in Solving the ...
- 10 Important Questions About Child Poverty
- Improving Preschool Even in Tough Economic Times
- A New Look at Family Structure, Income and Outcomes
- Tax Relief for Working Parents
- Latino Youth and the Failure of Justice
- 100 Voices/100 Days- How Are Children Doing?
- Two New Resources on Early Childhood for State Pol...
- Child Care Subsidies have Multiple Benefits for Pa...
- Public Sector Results-based Innovation, A Critical...
- Recession-induced Child Poverty Can Be Enduring
- How States Can Use Automation to Increase Health C...
- Stimulus Funding Working, At Least in Two States
-
▼
June
(19)
No comments:
Post a Comment