Monday, December 21, 2009
Friday, December 18, 2009
ASFA: Intentions and Results
Intentions and Results: A Look Back at the Adoption and Safe Families Act begins with a framework piece that provides an overview of the ASFA legislation, and analyzes state implementation efforts, the effects on service delivery and agency culture, and trends in outcomes for children and families since ASFA’s inception. Five perspective papers follow which capture the experiences from parents and youth directly affected by the legislation; the point of view from one of the original drafters of the law; a child welfare leader who has experienced these reform efforts firsthand; and, a judge charged with enforcing the law. The series include seven policy briefs by researchers, advocates, and policy analysts who examined the implications of ASFA for specific populations, such as parents who have a mental health or substance abuse illness. The series concludes with a set of recommendations from the Center for the Study of Social Policy.
For policies to safely increase exits from foster care to reunification, guardianship and adoption.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Flaws in How the Feds Hold the States Accountable for Foster Care
- Overlook important variation among states in the demographics of the children and families served.
- Fail to account for systemic state differences in caseload inclusion criteria, and the inherent practice and policy conflicts between measures.
- Draw on data derived from a database (AFCARS) that was not designed to measure longitudinal performance, and is still not of the quality to justify imposing fiscal penalties.
- Count/weight states equally despite enormous differences in the size of the child population.
- Employ a complicated statistical method, principal components analysis (PCA), in the absence of any evidence that such a method is in any way required or superior to simpler and more-transparent approaches to measurement.
- Make many arbitrary and statistically inappropriate decisions in the use of the PCA procedure, thereby undermining the ranking of states that the method produced.
- Arbitrarily set the national standard at the 75th percentile, and then rely on ill-conceived rules that adjust the standard to a different level.
State policymakers can use their own policies for holding their child welfare systems accountable.
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Results-based Public Policy: Did you miss the webinar?
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Illinois Integrated Assessment: Collaborative Results for Children and Families
A new report from Chapin Hall examines the Illinois Integrated Assessment (IA) program and its substantive effects on interventions for children and families. Begun in 2005, the IA partners child welfare caseworkers with licensed clinicians outside the child welfare system to collaborate on better-informed child and family assessments, which allow for the development of stronger service plans and earlier, more appropriate interventions. The report outlines the IA model, discusses its implementation, and explores its utilization through the experiences of frontline caseworkers. The IA program’s results for children, families, and even caseworkers provide a useful example to policymakers.
Policies to increase exits from foster care to permanency.
Monday, December 14, 2009
National Data on Households with Food-Insecure Children
Friday, December 11, 2009
Job Training in a Jobless Recovery: Training for What?
workers trained in such sector-based approaches earned more money and were more likely to remain employed than similar workers not chosen for the programs.Many of these employees were young, poor, African-American or Latino—among the groups hit hardest by unemployment. They go on to remind the White House, along with the rest of us, that
the chief lesson of the sector-based approach: the best money is spent training for a job that’s waiting to be filled.For state policies to promote sector-based job training.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Jobs and People of Color, What Can Policymakers Do?
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Spike in Foster Care Placements: the Economy or Re-balancing?
Certainly when recent headlines announce that "Texas leads the state in child abuse deaths", it is easy to see how this sudden "course correction" might occur. Another potential factor identified in the article is the Gates case, where the 5th Circuit clarified when social workers can remove children without a court order and when they are immune from prosecution. Many believe that following the Gates case, the Texas child welfare agency took a very strict view of when a child is considered to be in danger. However, the article also suggests that the economy could be a factor in the increase of child abuse cases. With the recession causing more families to experience hunger, homelessness, unemployment and family stress, there may also be an increase in child neglect or family violence. At the same time, many agencies are forced to lay off social workers.
What do you think? Is the Texas system re-balancing? Or is the economy resulting in more vulnerability for families and children? Or are agencies with fewer social workers less equipped to help families and children in crisis?
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Webinar: ASFA 12 Years Later
Monday, December 14, 2009; 9:00-10:45 a.m. ET
Panelists: Olivia Golden, Institute fellow, Urban Institute, and author, Reforming Child Welfare
John Mattingly, commissioner, New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services Carmen Nazario, assistant secretary for children and families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Susan Notkin, New York director, Center for the Study of Social Policy (moderator), Jeanette Vega, parent, writer for Rise magazine, and a community representative who guides parents in child safety conferences, Nancy Young, executive director, Children and Family Futures, and director, National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare
The ground-shifting Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) of 1997 was passed in response to growing concerns that the nation’s child welfare systems were not providing for the safety, permanency, and well-being of abused and neglected children. The ambitious new law aimed to reaffirm the focus on child safety in case decisionmaking and to ensure that children, rather than languish in foster care, were promptly connected with permanent families. It declared that, in making decisions about foster care and adoption placements, “the child’s health and safety shall be the paramount concern.”
A dozen years after passage of this landmark legislation, the Center for the Study of Social Policy and the Urban Institute are publishing a comprehensive retrospective titled Intentions and Results: A Look Back at the Adoption and Safe Families Act. Its 14 papers, by a broad sweep of scholars and practitioners, probe the realities of ASFA’s implementation compared to the hopes and fears that attended its enactment; its effects on families facing such issues as substance abuse, mental health problems, or parental incarceration; the perspectives of youth and families involved with the child welfare system; the future agenda for adoption, guardianship, and reunification; and more.
To mark the collection’s release, five panelists -- each with a unique perspective on the child welfare system -- will look back at the lessons of ASFA and assess what they mean for tomorrow’s vulnerable children and families, including opportunities presented by the new Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act.
To attend this event in Washington, D.C., RSVP at
http://www.urban.org/events/other/rsvp.cfm
e-mail paffairs@urban.org, or call (202) 261-5709.
To listen to the live audio webcast, register at
http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=64398.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Webinar: Results Based Public Policy, in Good Economic Times and Bad
Join us for a Webinar on December 9 at noon
Space is limited.Reserve your Webinar seat now at:https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/434474299
Results-Based Public Policy focuses the energy of government on a singular purpose: to achieve sustainable and measurable improvements for children, youth and families. Results-based Public Policy is defined as using the desired outcome to drive the actions taken by government to address a particular issue. This decision-making process for developing public policy starts with a clearly articulated desired result or outcome to be achieved, assesses current circumstances, uses policy options that have demonstrated an ability to achieve this outcome and evaluates progress through data and performance measures. The New York Times reports that, in spite of stimulus funding, states are severely cutting programs for the most vulnerable. Agencies must compete for scarce dollars while being evaluated on the basis of their ability to position states to thrive in unforgiving competitive national and global economies. Focusing on the results they want to achieve, states can maximize federal funding, create returns on investment and generate savings. States need tools, like policyforresults.org, designed to help policymakers make effective budget decisions that will both protect the most vulnerable and achieve long-term results for their state.
After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the Webinar.
System Requirements
PC-based attendeesRequired: Windows® 2000, XP Home, XP Pro, 2003 Server, Vista Macintosh®-based attendeesRequired: Mac OS® X 10.4 (Tiger®) or newer
Friday, December 4, 2009
Another Look at Foreclosure Mediation Programs
Thursday, December 3, 2009
What States Are Doing to Assist Immigrants With Integration
- Making sure that immigrants who work in highly skilled occupations, such as doctors, nurses, teachers, and researchers, can quickly obtain necessary U.S. licenses and credentials;
- Making sure that those with limited formal education have access to a combination of English instruction, adult education, and job training to improve their job prospects;
- Making sure that children of immigrants have access to, and use, programs that will help them be healthy and succeed in school;
- Making sure that immigrants know they are eligible for citizenship, understand how to apply, and know English well enough to qualify; and
- Helping immigrants understand the U.S. financial system and how banking and credit can help them.
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Seizing the Opportunity to Reframe and Integrate Human Service Administration
A white paper by the National Human Services Assembly’s Family Strengthening Center argues that the current economic crisis provides a key opportunity for rethinking the way human services frame “the client” and deliver services to children and families. The product of a May 2009 convening of national leaders in child, youth, and community development and family strengthening, the paper lays out major themes discussed and actionable strategies for reframing and cross-disciplinary service administration. In the face of challenges like organizational siloing and fragmented funding, the group calls for a new lens that acknowledges the family as the client, policy that supports families raising minor children, integrated and more accessible human services, and immediate changes in case management, data sharing, and benefits eligibility screening.
Policies that support children and families, and a framework for policy success.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage: The 2007-2008 Data
- Real median household income fell between 2007 and 2008. The decline was widespread and coincided with the recession that started in December 2007.
- The poverty rate increased between 2007 and 2008.
- Though the percentage of uninsured was not statistically different than in 2007, the number of uninsured increased between 2007 and 2008.
Policies to increase family economic success and policies to improve health care access.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Analyzing Barriers to Children’s Movement Out of Foster Care in New York City
Policies to increase exits from foster care to permanence.
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Facts for Policymakers: Adolescent Violence and Injuries
Monday, November 23, 2009
Helping Judges Promote Better Outcomes for Children Aged Zero-to-Three
Policies to increase quality early care and education and policies to support and strengthen vulnerable families. Sign up at http://www.policyforresults.org/ to receive updates about our forthcoming child abuse and neglect content!
Friday, November 20, 2009
For Federal Policymakers: How to Better Identify and Serve Children of Incarcerated Parents
Policies to support and strengthen vulnerable families.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Creating Campus Supports for Foster Youth in College
- Provide financial, academic, and emotional/social support
- Designate a full-time point person for foster youth support
- Build an advisory committee and solicit feedback from foster youth students to inform programming
- Provide year-round, on-campus housing for foster youth
- Avoid siloing of activities for foster youth, instead integrating them into the university community
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Toolkit for Child Welfare about Working with Immigrant Families
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Spotlight Commentary: The Two-Generation Approach, By Frank Farrow, Director, Center for the Study of Social Policy
a “two-generation” effort, focused on promoting the economic well-being of parents and simultaneously ensuring that young children are healthy, safe and succeeding in school. That means effective programs that help more low-income, low-skilled adults get and hold jobs, and access available public benefits like food stamps, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, child care, education and tax credits, that can add up to sufficient income to provide for their families. It also means making sure that their children get the best possible start in life, are reading by third grade, and move forward with successful school careers, including post-secondary education.For state policies to support a two generation strategy using the federal stimulus money, including an online guide for policymakers.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Massachusetts Introduces New Growth Model for Tracking Student Progress
Friday, November 13, 2009
The Center for the Study of Social Policy is pleased to announce a new Board Chair and a new Senior Fellow
Bill Traynor, the Executive Director of Lawrence Community Works (LCW) has joined CSSP as a Senior Fellow. Mr. Traynor leads a 5000 member network of resident stakeholders in Lawrence, Massachusetts and has achieved national acclaim for inspiring new investments to the city and creating new grass roots initiatives in family asset building, youth development, community organizing, and housing. While continuing his duties at LCW, Bill will work with an array of CSSP projects and initiatives to incorporate community and network organizing into the Center’s longstanding organizational priority to engage residents, constituents and customers’ perspectives into the work to improve outcomes for children, families and communities.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Facilitating State JJDPA Compliance and Advancing Juvenile Delinquency Prevention
A new report by Coalition for Juvenile Justice (CJJ) presents the findings from the Survey of the State Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) Compliance Challenges and Successes, administered by the CJJ and the Justice Policy Institute in 2008. Fifty-five of 56 states and territories currently voluntarily adhere to the standards of care and custody laid out by the 1974 legislation, though challenges with compliance were expressed in the survey. The report outlines these findings and makes recommendations to key stakeholders for support state efforts. Findings include:
- After 35 years, states remain committed to goals and purposes of the JJDPA.
- Overall, the President, OJJDP and Congress continue to provide bipartisan leadership and resources to support the mandates of the JJDPA.
- States embrace OJJDP as a critical partner to provide training, technical assistance, research and evaluation in support of JJDPA compliance and best practices around juvenile justice.
- Dramatic decreases in federal JJDPA appropriations threaten states’ abilities to maintain compliance with the JJDPA, and OJJDP’s ability to support states in those efforts.
- States need special assistance from OJJDP and other knowledgeable partners to better safeguard status offenders, achieve measurable reductions in DMC (Disproportionate Minority Contact) and increase compliance successes in Native American and rural/frontier communities.
- The JJDPA is at a pivotal moment, and renewed commitments from the President, Congress and other JJDPA stakeholders are critical to sustaining the success and enhancing the future of the JJDPA.
Policies to reduce juvenile detention.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Risk and Recovery: Understanding the Changing Risks to Family Incomes
More than 13 percent of nonelderly adults in families with children will see their incomes fall by half at some point over the course of a year, and about 40 percent fully recover within a year. Those who lose jobs or have an adult leave the family are more likely to have a substantial drop in income and are less likely to recover.Policies to improve family economic success.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
How Can States and Communities Reduce Disproportionality in Juvenile Justice?
Policies to reduce racial disparities in juvenile detention.
Monday, November 9, 2009
State Child Care Policies Losing Ground
many state policies are behind where they were in 2001 and many low-income families remain unable to receive child care assistance, or receive child care assistance that fails to provide sufficient support. ... Affordable, reliable child care that enables parents to work and children to develop and thrive is essential.Policies that support increasing quality early care and education to support child development and policies that support access to child care to support working families
Friday, November 6, 2009
New Quality Improvement Center for Early Childhood
The Children’s Bureau funded the Center for the Study of Social Policy (CSSP) to create the National Quality Improvement Center on Preventing the Abuse and Neglect of Infants and Young Children, better known as the QIC on Early Childhood (QIC-EC). CSSP has partnered with ZERO TO THREE: National Center for Infants, Toddlers, and Families, and the National Alliance of Children’s Trust and Prevention Funds. The purpose of this 5-year project is to generate and disseminate robust evidence and new knowledge about program and systems strategies that contribute to child maltreatment prevention and optimal developmental outcomes for infants, young children, and their families. This project was initiated because of growing research that points to the critical importance of early life experiences in shaping the developmental outcomes for children in later life. The QIC-EC has the following roles and responsibilities:
- Develop knowledge about evidence-based and evidence-informed strategies aimed at preventing the abuse and neglect of infants and young children.
- Promote collective problem solving through funding selected early childhood and child abuse prevention research and demonstration projects that advance innovative evidence-based and evidence-informed practice improvements and knowledge about preventing child maltreatment and promoting child and family well-being.
- Establish a national information-sharing network to disseminate promising practices.
- Evaluate the impact of projects implementing evidence-based or evidence-informed child abuse prevention programs in reducing the risk of child maltreatment.
- Identify barriers to prevention and recommend changes in policies, procedures, and practice.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
State Examples from Charting Progress for Babies in Child Care
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Governor's Guide to Drop Out Prevention
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Improving Urban Service Systems for Children and Families
Chapin Hall hosts a webcast on Improving Urban Service Systems for Children and Families, on November 19, 2009 at 10 a.m. ET / 9 a.m. CT / 8 a.m. MT / 7 a.m. PT Program length: 1.5 hours To Register
This forum will examine the many challenges of systems reform--through the lenses of education, health care and child welfare--and the steps, partnerships, and strategies required to help foster the successful development of vulnerable children and families. The panel will examine questions such as:
- What does it take to reform urban systems?
- What are the lessons for suburban and rural services?
- What can one service system learn from another?
- How can research on practices and policies contribute to reform?
Monday, November 2, 2009
Raising Poverty’s Political Profile and Increasing Access to Opportunity
Policies to reduce poverty and promote family economic success.
Friday, October 30, 2009
Helping State Policymakers Understand and Utilize Research
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Webcast: Who Moves, Who Stays,The Resilience of Low-Income Communities
Panelists will discuss whether low-income families move because of financial and other problems or to find better homes or communities; whether mobility supports or undermines neighborhood stability; how federal neighborhood revitalization initiatives should respond to high rates of family mobility; and what role cities and nonprofits should play in serving families that move and those that stay.
Panelists: Raphael Bostic, assistant secretary for policy development and research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; Claudia Coulton, professor of urban social research and codirector, Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change, Case Western Reserve University; Brett Theodos, research associate, Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center, Urban Institute; Bill Traynor, executive director, Lawrence (Mass.) Community Works; and Margery Austin Turner, vice president for research, Urban Institute (moderator)
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Two Federal Agencies and a Foundation Come Together to Expand a Successful Juvenile Services Model
RWJF launched Reclaiming Futures in 2002 to address these urgent needs by reinventing how juvenile courts work. The initiative brings together judges, probation officers, treatment providers, families and community members to improve drug and alcohol treatment for young people in trouble with the law.
Researchers at Columbia University, for example, found that four out of five teens in the juvenile justice system are under the influence of alcohol or drugs while committing their crimes. And in spite of research that shows treatment helps reduce recidivism, most juvenile courts aren’t set up to detect and treat substance abuse or to provide mental health and other important services. “Most juveniles admitted to treatment are referred from the criminal justice system,” said Eric Broderick, acting administrator for SAMHSA. “These grants will use practices proven to help young people get off drugs and back on track toward building fulfilling lives.” (Excerpted from the press release) For policies to reduce juvenile detention.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
The High Costs of High School Drop Outs
Why should policymakers care? In addition to the societal costs in this generation and the next as these high school drop outs raise their children in poverty, the fiscal costs are staggering: " The average high school dropout will cost taxpayers over $292,000 in lower tax revenues, higher cash and in-kind transfer costs, and imposed incarceration costs relative to an average high school graduate."
Contributors
Search This Blog
Labels
- Family Economic Success (147)
- Child Well-being (123)
- Poverty (97)
- Early Care and Education (89)
- Data (71)
- State Budgets (71)
- Child Welfare (62)
- Federal Budget (60)
- Results (55)
- Education (53)
- Stimulus (48)
- Foster Care (47)
- Racial Equity (47)
- Policymakers (43)
- Juvenile Detention (41)
- Job Training (30)
- Ensuring Children are Healthy and Prepared to Succeed in School (29)
- Food Stamps (28)
- Healthy Children (26)
- Home Foreclosures (15)
- Medicaid (15)
- Partnerships (11)
- Low-income (10)
- Affordable Housing (8)
- SNAP (8)
- Affordable Care Act (6)
- Guest Blogger (6)
- Improve Early Grade-Level Reading (6)
- Reintegration of Ex-Offenders (6)
- Courts (5)
- Home Visiting (5)
- Sequester (5)
- mental health (4)
- Census (3)
- EITC (3)
- Health Equity (3)
- Higher Education (3)
- Income inequality (3)
- TANF (3)
- Transitioning Youth (3)
- Video (3)
- health insurance (3)
- juvenile justice (3)
- Collaboration (2)
- Disparities in Health Care (2)
- Minimum wage (2)
- Teen Pregnancy (2)
- immigration (2)
- place-based initiatives (2)
- who pays (2)
- Arizona v. United States (1)
- Black male education (1)
- Black men going to college (1)
- Buffett Rule (1)
- Child Tax Credit (1)
- Criminal Justice (1)
- DMC (1)
- Introduction to Website (1)
- Mexican migration (1)
- Minority Health Month (1)
- NIH Minority Health Promotion Day (1)
- Navigator Program (1)
- Promise Neighborhoods (1)
- SOTU (1)
- Strengthening Families (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Success Stories (1)
- asset tests (1)
- benefits of immigrant integration (1)
- http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif (1)
- immigrant demographic (1)
- just tax (1)
- progressive tax (1)
- regressive tax (1)
- social security (1)
- solitary confinement (1)
- tax policy (1)
- tax returns (1)
- unemployment insurance (1)
- welcome (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(215)
-
▼
December
(15)
- Happy Holidays!
- ASFA: Intentions and Results
- Flaws in How the Feds Hold the States Accountable ...
- Results-based Public Policy: Did you miss the webi...
- Illinois Integrated Assessment: Collaborative Resu...
- National Data on Households with Food-Insecure Chi...
- Job Training in a Jobless Recovery: Training for W...
- Jobs and People of Color, What Can Policymakers Do?
- Spike in Foster Care Placements: the Economy or Re...
- Webinar: ASFA 12 Years Later
- Webinar: Results Based Public Policy, in Good Econ...
- Another Look at Foreclosure Mediation Programs
- What States Are Doing to Assist Immigrants With In...
- Seizing the Opportunity to Reframe and Integrate H...
- Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage: Th...
-
►
November
(19)
- Analyzing Barriers to Children’s Movement Out of F...
- Happy Thanksgiving!
- Facts for Policymakers: Adolescent Violence and In...
- Helping Judges Promote Better Outcomes for Childre...
- For Federal Policymakers: How to Better Identify a...
- Creating Campus Supports for Foster Youth in College
- Toolkit for Child Welfare about Working with Immig...
- Spotlight Commentary: The Two-Generation Approach,...
- Massachusetts Introduces New Growth Model for Trac...
- The Center for the Study of Social Policy is pleas...
- Facilitating State JJDPA Compliance and Advancing ...
- Risk and Recovery: Understanding the Changing Risk...
- How Can States and Communities Reduce Disproportio...
- State Child Care Policies Losing Ground
- New Quality Improvement Center for Early Childhood
- State Examples from Charting Progress for Babies i...
- Governor's Guide to Drop Out Prevention
- Improving Urban Service Systems for Children and F...
- Raising Poverty’s Political Profile and Increasing...
-
▼
December
(15)